USPTO serial 99624450
ROLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Makiko Coffland
Makiko Coffland Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring computer software, subscription-based software, computer applications, custom prints, design data, computer-operated machines in the nature of printers, heat press machines, color measurement devices, and cutting machines and their parts, ink for computer printers, paper and films for computer printers, cleaning fluids for computer printers; Arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote the sale of computer software, subscription-based software, computer applications, custom prints, design data, computer-operated machines in the nature of printers, heat press machines, color measurement devices, cutting machines and their parts, ink for computer printers, paper and films for computer printers, cleaning fluids for computer printers; all aforesaid services NOT being those services relating to industrial gravure printing, letterpress printing or offset printing machines, or to parts or consumables therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing warranties on goods manufactured by others in the nature of computer-operated machines, maintenance kits for computer-operated machines, refurbished computer-operated machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and replacement of computer-operated machines, maintenance kits for computer-operated machines, refurbished computer-operated machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |