Drawing for THE REAL DEAL

USPTO serial 99625331

THE REAL DEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JARAMILLO, JAVIER R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE REAL DEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie L. Ellerbach

Connie L. Ellerbach Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-1990

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, providing health insurance by issuing and administrating health benefit plans, and providing underwriting and claims administration in the field of health insurance; consultation services regarding insurance services and coverage, namely, advising health care companies in the field of health insurance, plan administration, clinical and care management servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance