Drawing for BANYAN

USPTO serial 99626496

BANYAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ODUSAMI, OLUWAKEMI KEHINDE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANYAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tianjun Hou

Tianjun Hou HOUST CONSULTINGP.O. Box 700092San Jose, CA 95170United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Catheters; Balloon catheters; Medical and surgical catheters; Catheters and parts and fittings therefor; Catheters for use in vascular, neurovascular, and interventional proceduresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance