USPTO serial 99630339
CURE BIGDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CURE BIGDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Market research and analysis in the field of synthetic data; business consulting services utilizing synthetic data; business advisory services relating to data-driven management strategies; commercial information agency services for synthetic data and data sets; business intermediary services for the sale and purchase of goods and services, namely, arranging of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and services, for others; business consulting services relating to data marketing strategies; distributorship services for businesses in the field of synthetic data; brokerage services relating to business-to-business data partnerships and data collaborations, namely, business intermediary services relating to the matching of various professionals with clients; business advisory services relating to business models utilizing public and private data; business consulting services relating to planning and packaging of data products; business consulting services relating to data asset management and valuation; business consulting services relating to construction of data for artificial intelligence training; business intermediary services relating to mail order by telecommunications, namely, mediation of contracts for purchase and sale of products; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line comprehensive shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others; retail store services featuring downloadable computer programs for generating synthetic data; retail store services featuring downloadable programs software for de-identification and pseudonymization of personal data; retail store services featuring downloadable computer software for verification and evaluation of synthetic data quality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |