Drawing for CURE BIGDATA

USPTO serial 99630339

CURE BIGDATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURE BIGDATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Market research and analysis in the field of synthetic data; business consulting services utilizing synthetic data; business advisory services relating to data-driven management strategies; commercial information agency services for synthetic data and data sets; business intermediary services for the sale and purchase of goods and services, namely, arranging of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and services, for others; business consulting services relating to data marketing strategies; distributorship services for businesses in the field of synthetic data; brokerage services relating to business-to-business data partnerships and data collaborations, namely, business intermediary services relating to the matching of various professionals with clients; business advisory services relating to business models utilizing public and private data; business consulting services relating to planning and packaging of data products; business consulting services relating to data asset management and valuation; business consulting services relating to construction of data for artificial intelligence training; business intermediary services relating to mail order by telecommunications, namely, mediation of contracts for purchase and sale of products; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line comprehensive shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others; retail store services featuring downloadable computer programs for generating synthetic data; retail store services featuring downloadable programs software for de-identification and pseudonymization of personal data; retail store services featuring downloadable computer software for verification and evaluation of synthetic data qualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 28, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance