USPTO serial 99630367
CURE BIGDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CURE BIGDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of software for generating synthetic data using artificial intelligence; services for de-identification, pseudonymization and anonymization of personal data, namely, computer programming and data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; development of Internet-based computer platforms for data security and privacy protection for large language models; cloud computing services featuring software for use in generating synthetic data and for use in de-identification and pseudonymization of personal data; providing computer technology consultancy in the field of verification and evaluation of synthetic data quality; programming and development of internet computer platforms for online data marketplaces; design, maintenance and updating of software for data integration, data cleansing and data management; design, maintenance and updating of computer software for data privacy protection; technical computer programming advisory services relating to data processing; providing web hosting platforms for providing information relating to synthetic data; development of IT security software; design and development of electronic data security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |