Drawing for ENNOIA

USPTO serial 99630521

ENNOIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENNOIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for creating artificial intelligence agents; Downloadable computer software for designing, generating and maintaining artificial intelligence agent builder platforms; Downloadable computer software for operating and monitoring artificial intelligence agents; Downloadable computer software for machine learning–based data analysis and prediction; Downloadable computer software for configuring and managing data pipelines; Downloadable computer software for data governance and access control management; Downloadable computer software for training, tuning, and deploying artificial intelligence models; Downloadable computer software for business process automation; Downloadable computer software for designing, generating and maintaining cloud-based artificial intelligence services; Downloadable computer software used to educate and train artificial intelligence agents; Downloadable computer application software for transmitting and installing artificial intelligence agentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance