USPTO serial 99630669
KELA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with KELA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tel Aviv - Yafo, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin D. McCarthy
Kevin D. McCarthy Roach Brown McCarthy & Gruber, P.C.1920 Liberty Building424 Main StreetBuffalo, NY 14202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, firmware, and hardware in the commercial field; software, firmware, and hardware in the security field; network systems including hardware, software, and data links for network hardware in a battlefield environment for use with manned and unmanned platforms; software and hardware systems based on artificial intelligence for use in the security field; software and hardware systems based on an open and modular architecture, enabling security agencies to integrate new technologies into existing systems in order to expand their operational capabilities in a manner adapted to field conditions; battlefield and military battle management systems, including computer hardware and embedded computer software for the planning, command, and control of military missions and operations; mobile platform for secure sharing of information from civilian and military tactical systems; software and hardware for drones and unmanned aircraft; navigation and guidance devices for drones and unmanned aircraft, equipment for drones and unmanned aircraft, interception systems for drones and unmanned aircraft, command and control systems for counter-drone and unmanned aircraft defense applications; downloadable software for counter-drone and autonomous interception; software and hardware systems for command and control in counter-drone defense applications. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS); technical consulting services in the field of military defense; software and computer hardware design and development services; software and computer hardware updating; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; scientific and technological services in the field of drones, drone equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles; industrial analysis and industrial research in the field of drones, drone equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles; engineering drafting in the field of drones and unmanned aerial vehicles; engineering consulting and technological consulting in the field of drones and unmanned aerial vehicles; development, design, styling, implementation, updating, and maintenance of operating software and control software for drones, drone equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles; explosive engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |