Drawing for CEECEE

USPTO serial 99631439

CEECEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEECEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

Norm J. Rich Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for simulating interpersonal conversations related to diabetes management via text, audio and video messaging, and live chat for use in obtaining authorization to reorder diabetes related medical and pharmacy supplies, provide diabetes management information to customers of medical and pharmacy supplies, and provide customized diabetes management information to authorized users regarding disease management and insurance coverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance