Drawing for DEAL COMMAND

USPTO serial 99631706

DEAL COMMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOZAK, EVIN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEAL COMMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Marie Martin

Kathryn Marie Martin MARTIN LEGACY LEGAL, LLC14502 Greenview Dr S 5001065Laurel, MD 20708

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for time-tracking; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project management; Advisory services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application and database integration; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project management and scheduling; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for recording time spent on certain tasks; Software as a service (SAAS) services in the nature of hosting cloud-based software of others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for generating business analysis reports; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for sales performance analysis, sales execution intelligence, pipeline management, sales forecasting, talent performance analysis, succession planning, and data-driven decision support for sales teams and sales leadership.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance