USPTO serial 99634871
INKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUENAS, TAYLOR S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with INKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Casciano in Val di Pesa (FI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebeccah Gan
Rebeccah Gan Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal door reinforcements; metal keys; metal door fastenings; non-electric metal devices for opening doors; metal door stops; bolts (door bolts); armoured metal doors; metal doors; metal badges for vehicles; snap-action locks; non-electric metal locks; metal locks for vehicles; metal door security chains; metal security doors; door protectors made of metal chains; metal locks and metal locks with their corresponding keys | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Magnetic cards; encoded key cards; magnetic encoders; electronic numeric displays; security authentication devices (tokens); electric devices for remote ignition; electronic computers; biometric locks; electric locks; electronic access control systems for revolving doors; optical door viewers; encoded magnetic cards; anti-theft alarms (other than for vehicles); electronic lock assemblies; magnetically encoded key cards; computer software for enabling access or entry control; electromagnetic locks; downloadable software for remote monitoring and analysis; security surveillance apparatus; remote control apparatus for opening and closing doors; remote control apparatus for opening and closing vehicle doors; electric apparatus for access control; apparatus and instruments for remote control; equipment for verifying data on encoded magnetic cards; mobile applications; radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; electronic keys for vehicles; electronic control circuits; wireless control devices for remotely monitoring and controlling the function and status of other electrical, electronic and mechanical devices or systems; radio frequency identification (RFID) readers; integrated circuit card readers; encoded cards; electronic access cards; magnetically encoded access cards; sensors; sensors, detectors and monitoring instruments; electric snap-action locks; digital door locks; electronic locks; electronic door locks; smart locks; fingerprint door locks; vehicle tracking systems; application software; computer software for wireless network communication; downloadable computer software for remote monitoring and analysis; monitoring instruments; computer keypads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |