USPTO serial 99636339
REGULATING AI INNOVATE RESPONSIBLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGULATING AI INNOVATE RESPONSIBLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Great Falls, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Walters
James Walters PATENTTM.USSuite 300, 205 SE Spokane StreetPortland, OR 97202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing public policy information via a website; Providing public policy information in the field of artificial intelligence and legislation and regulation of artificial intelligence; Providing public policy information in the field of artificial intelligence and legislation and regulation of artificial intelligence via a website | ACTIVE | Jul 3, 2024 |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing live and on-line seminars, workshops in the field of legislation and regulation related to artificial intelligence; Organizing and conducting of seminars in the field of legislation and regulation of artificial intelligence; Workshops and seminars in the field of legislation and regulation of artificial intelligence; Conducting of seminars in the field of legislation and regulation of artificial intelligence; Production of podcasts; Workshops and seminars in the field of artificial intelligence and the regulation and legislation thereof thereof; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of artificial intelligence and the regulation and legislation thereof; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of artificial intelligence and the regulation and legislation thereof | ACTIVE | Jul 3, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |