USPTO serial 99636924
WEAVE.AI BEACONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEAVE.AI BEACONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sammamish, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave. Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business data analysis; Analysis of business data | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2025 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for data analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for risk analysis; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for machine learning for data analytics; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for operational management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for workflow management; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for risk management, data management and opportunity assessment; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for data processing; Computer software development; Computer programming services for artificial intelligence applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for tracking enterprise engagement and metrics; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for providing predictive analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for technical data analysis of business workflows, operations, and risk assessment and analysis | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |