USPTO serial 99639766
EPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Zarin
Scott Zarin Zarin & Associates LLC1178 Broadway, 3rd FloorNew York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Non-metal pipe muffs; Non-metal pipe couplings and joints; Non-metal junctions for pipes; Non-metal fittings for pipes; Non-metal elbows for pipes | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2024 |
| 019 | Non-metal water pipes; Non-metal roofing for industrial use; PVC roofing membrane for industrial use; Synthetic roofing shingles for industrial use; Non-metal roofing tiles for industrial use; Non-metal roofing hips for industrial use; Non-metal roofing panels for industrial use; Roofing for industrial use, not of metal; Non-metal roof trusses for industrial use; Non-metal roof coverings for industrial use; Non-metal roof panels for industrial use; Roof coverings for industrial use, not of metal; Roof panels for industrial use, not of metal; PVC railings; Non-metal railings and facade panels for construction purposes; Non-metal guard rails; Non-metal railings for safety at chemical plants, power plants, water treatment and sewage plants, refineries, cooling towers, railroad tracks and other industrial facilities; Non-metal sewer pipes | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |