USPTO serial 99640756
ATP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ATP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salon-de-Provence, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL F. SWARTZ
MICHAEL F. SWARTZ EGBERT, MCDANIEL & SWARTZ, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments; medical apparatus and instruments; dental apparatus and instruments; veterinary apparatus and instruments; artificial limbs; artificial eyes; artificial teeth; orthopaedic articles; suture material; stockings for varicose veins; feeding bottles; baby bottle teats; special clothing for operating theatres; massage apparatus; prostheses; artificial implants; chairs for medical or dental use; surgical drapes; bedpans; basins for medical use; special furniture for medical use; surgical cutlery; orthopaedic footwear; walking frames for disabled persons | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus; heating apparatus; steam generating apparatus; cooking apparatus; refrigerating apparatus; drying apparatus; water distribution apparatus; sanitary installations; air conditioning apparatus; air conditioning installations; freezers; electric torches; electric coffee makers; cookers; lighting apparatus for vehicles; heating installations for vehicles; air conditioning installations for vehicles; apparatus and machines for purifying air; apparatus and machines for purifying water; sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design (engineering work); scientific research; technical research; computer design for third parties; computer development; software design; software development; research and development of new products for third parties; conducting technical project studies; architecture; interior design; software development (design); software installation; software maintenance; software updating; software rental; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer system design; computer hardware design and development consultancy services; document digitisation; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; information technology consultancy; server hosting; technical inspection of motor vehicles; graphic design services; industrial design; authentication of works of art; energy audits; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |