USPTO serial 99641562
MAIAEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAIAEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Concannon
Patrick J. Concannon Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLPSeaport West, 155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for telecommunications | ACTIVE | Jul 11, 2025 |
| 042 | Managed service provider services, namely, leasing of computer hardware and computer peripheral equipment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in managing network connections, facilitating automation, troubleshooting network and security issues, and providing analytics in the field of cloud computing; Infrastructure as a service (IaaS), namely, hosting software for infrastructure services in the nature of providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments to manage and deploy business applications and data applications; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for automated network path computation and provisioning; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for orchestrating private connectivity across carrier networks; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for network-to-network interconnection (NNI) automation; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing real-time network telemetry, visibility, and SLA enforcement across multiple network domains; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for enabling automated provisioning of deterministic private paths over fiber and dedicated internet access (DIA); Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for application programming interface (API) integrations for others' websites; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for enabling network operators to offer self-service connectivity purchasing to their customers; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software featuring an online marketplace that enables network operators to partner, list, discover, initiate and enable connectivity services across network service providers | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |