USPTO serial 99641647
SIGNALHAWK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGNALHAWK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Franco
Laura M. Franco Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.COne Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Unified industrial alarm management and critical-communications downloadable software platform designed to centralize, monitor, route, escalate, and audit operational alerts across industrial and enterprise environments; downloadable software for industrial alarm management, alert monitoring, event notification, message routing, escalation management, acknowledgment tracking, reporting, and integration with industrial control systems, SCADA systems, building automation systems, IoT devices, and enterprise applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Unified industrial alarm management and critical-communications services, namely, electronic data transmission for centralizing, monitoring, routing, escalating, and auditing operational alerts across industrial and enterprise environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable unified industrial alarm management and critical-communications software platform designed to centralize, monitor, route, escalate, and audit operational alerts across industrial and enterprise environments; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for industrial alarm management, alert monitoring, event notification, message routing, escalation management, acknowledgment tracking, reporting, and integration with industrial control systems, SCADA systems, building automation systems, IoT devices, and enterprise applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |