Drawing for TORRU

USPTO serial 99643740

TORRU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORRU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Casey Scott McKay

Casey Scott McKay MC Law PLLC1441 U St. NWWashington DC, DC 20009United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consulting services in the field of drive-thru restaurant operations; business data analysis services in the field of drive-thru restaurant operations; business performance analytics services, namely, analyzing and compiling business data for drive-thru restaurant operations.PARTIALLY PAIDJan 18, 2026
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing, scheduling, and displaying digital menu board content, automated order taking using voice recognition and natural language processing, and tracking and analyzing operational data, for use in drive-thru restaurant operations.PARTIALLY PAIDJan 18, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance