USPTO serial 99644092
MERIDIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERIDIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Maskell
Benjamin Maskell MASKELL LAW PLLC937 N Daniel StArlington, VA 22201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in customer relationship management (CRM), namely, for storing contact information, deal management, deal analysis, deal discovery, deal and company data enrichment, and investor relations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in customer relationship management (CRM), namely, for storing contact information, deal management, deal analysis, deal discovery, deal and company data enrichment, and investor relations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for use in customer relationship management (CRM), namely, for storing contact information, deal management, deal analysis, deal discovery, deal and company data enrichment, and investor relations. | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |