USPTO serial 99644371
MC35
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MC35?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rietheim-Weilheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Bond
Katherine Bond CISLO & THOMAS LLP2829 Townsgate Road, Ste. 330Westlake Village, CA 91361United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | signaling devices, in particular radio signal transmitters, acoustic signal transmitters being led installation beacons for transmitting status about machines, optical signal transmitters being led installation beacons for transmitting status about machines electric warning lights, flashing safety lights, and strobe lights being warning beacons, telecommunication signal towers, electric buzzers, electronic warning horns, sirens, signal bells, and radio elements being proximity sensors for warning and emergency purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |