USPTO serial 99644574
PWC - PLANT WIDE CONTROLLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLONCH, ABIGAIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PWC - PLANT WIDE CONTROLLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portland, TN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla L. Gannon
Carla L. Gannon Dilworth & Barrese, LLP48 South Service Road, Suite 200Melville, NY 11747United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Industrial control hardware, namely, controllers and data acquisition hardware for monitoring, managing, and controlling energy generation, storage, and distribution equipment; industrial automation controllers; programmable logic controllers (PLCs); downloadable computer software and firmware for collecting, aggregating, transmitting, visualizing, and analyzing operational data from energy assets, sensors, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices; downloadable software for remote monitoring and control of power plants, microgrids, battery energy storage systems, data centers, and industrial and commercial facilities; communication gateways and network interface hardware for connecting energy and industrial equipment to cloud-based platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in monitoring, managing, controlling, and optimizing energy generation, storage, and distribution systems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for real-time data acquisition, automation, predictive analytics, and remote asset management of energy plants, microgrids, battery energy storage systems, data centers, and industrial and commercial facilities; providing cloud-based platforms for integrating, monitoring, and controlling Internet of Things (IoT) devices and industrial equipment; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms that enable secure transmission of operational data to remote network operations centers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |