USPTO serial 99644640
CHARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dover, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Kobulnick
Jeffrey A. Kobulnick LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO, MARSHALL & HARLAN16633 Ventura Boulevard, 11th FloorEncino, CA 91436United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable electronic devices incorporating computer hardware and recorded software for capturing, storing, transmitting, and processing audio data; wearable electronic devices incorporating microphones, data storage, and wireless communication modules for creating, managing, and retrieving digital voice recordings; downloadable and recorded software for artificial intelligence–based memory management, data transcription, and personal information organization; smart jewelry in the nature of smart necklaces and smart pendants being computer peripherals that communicate data to other electronic devices; downloadable computer software through which users may listen to auditory content in the field of meditation, relaxation, breathing exercises, mindfulness, and wellness; Downloadable software for artificial intelligence-based voice analysis, emotional awareness feedback, and haptic vibration notifications | ACTIVE | Aug 9, 2025 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for transcribing, summarizing, organizing, searching, managing, storing, and retrieving audio recordings, transcripts, and searchable digital journals; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for artificial intelligence–based memory management, data transcription, and personal information organization; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for voice analysis, emotional awareness coaching, and haptic feedback guidance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for artificial intelligence-based voice analysis, emotional awareness coaching, and haptic feedback guidance | ACTIVE | Aug 9, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |