USPTO serial 99645306
ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERTHELSEN, JONAH REVNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Focarino
Brian J. Focarino Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for reviewing, benchmarking, evaluating, ranking, comparing, routing, testing, discussing, and analyzing artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence agents, language model software, chatbot software, and AI-based interactive software; providing an online website featuring technology that enables organizing artificial intelligence model, artificial intelligence agent, chatbot, and language model software competitions, in particular, for organizing a point system and leaderboard, and for sharing usage and comparison details and statistics with other users for entertainment and education purposes; providing an online website featuring technology that enables routing of users to artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence agents, chatbots, and language model software based on user inputs and user-defined categories; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for reviewing, benchmarking, evaluating, ranking, comparing, routing, testing, discussing, and analyzing artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence agents, language model software, chatbot software, and AI-based interactive software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |