Drawing for ROSHEL SMART ARMOURED VEHICLES

USPTO serial 99645582

ROSHEL SMART ARMOURED VEHICLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 612
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALEN, SAMUEL TURNER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSHEL SMART ARMOURED VEHICLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL DAVIS

PAUL DAVIS OUTSOURCE ASIAPO BOX 320769San Francisco, CA 94132United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Armored vehicles; Armoured cars; Armoured bodies for vehiclesACTIVE—
037Custom rebuilding of existing land vehicles and structural parts therefor; Maintenance and/or repair of armored vehicles; maintenance and repair of armored vehicle panels and components; maintenance and repair of personal protective armor; Custom installation of exterior, interior and mechanical parts of vehiclesACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; Product development and engineering services for others; Design and development of computer software; Engineering services in the field of armored vehicles and of advanced technological solutions for vehicle protection; Product research and development; Scientific research consulting in the field of ballistic testing services, namely, testing and evaluation of weapon, ammunition and armor for vehicle armored protection; Technology consultation and research in the field of vehicle security risk and threat assessment; Computer programming services; Design and programming of computer software; Consulting services in the field of computer hardware design for others; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of computer hardware, firmware, and software with respect to surveillance, routing, risks, and risk mitigation for vehicles, monitoring progress and notifying emergency addresses; design and programming of software, firmware and hardware for assessing and mitigating security threats with respect to in-transit vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2026APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 30, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 11, 2026GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 21, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2026GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2026GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2026NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 23, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance