Drawing for TORMAX

USPTO serial 99651294

TORMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GREENE, JOSEPH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angel Roman Campos

Angel Roman Campos MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE PC125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Adhesive-applying machines for industrial use; Spraying machines for coatings; Machines for processing plastics; Rubber processing machines; Mixing machines; Industrial robots; Soldering apparatus, electric; UV printing machines for commercial or industrial use; Grinding machines for eyeglass lenses; Machines for manufacturing micro and non-scale structures by solidifying a fluid compound to conform to a shape of a mold; Engraving machines; Adhesive dispensing machines for industrial useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 13, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 13, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance