USPTO serial 99651360
COFORGE VOYAGER AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COFORGE VOYAGER AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gurugram, Haryana, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHUN T. WRIGHT
CHUN T. WRIGHT LAW OFFICE OF CHUN T. WRIGHT, PLLC1750 H Street, NWSuite 360Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development, configuration being design, and implementation of software in the fields of software platforms, application acceleration toolkits, and technical frameworks for airline customer intelligence, passenger journey analytics, and real-time personalization; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing data and data integration based on personalized data entry for the aviation industry; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analyzing data and data integration based on personalized data entry for the aviation industry; Design and development of computer software frameworks for application integration in the fields of airline passenger service systems, loyalty systems, and digital experience platforms; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for processing data in the fields of segmentation, predictive insights, and artificial intelligence-enabled personalization; Computer technology consultancy services in the fields of airline data integration, customer experience systems, and digital journey orchestration being the configuration, customization, and deployment of application acceleration toolkits, software frameworks, reference architectures, and reusable solution components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |