USPTO serial 99652029
STRATOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FABER, COURTNEY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 303
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with STRATOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason E. Garcia
Jason E. Garcia ArentFox Schiff LLP44 Montgomery Street, 38th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIDAR apparatus; object tracking apparatus being a LIDAR apparatus; 3D scanning apparatus being a 3D scanner; 3D mapping apparatus being a 3D scanner; environment modeling apparatus being a computer; range detection apparatus being a LIDAR apparatus; distance detection apparatus being a LIDAR apparatus; distance light detection and ranging apparatus; light detection and ranging apparatus; LIDAR system comprised of computer hardware and recorded software for light detection and ranging all sold as a component of LIDAR apparatus; LIDAR apparatus for use with autonomous vehicles; distance detection apparatus being a LIDAR apparatus for use with autonomous vehicles, aviation, defense, rail, security, logistics, industrial automation, and point cloud generation applications; LIDAR apparatus for use with smart infrastructure; recorded and downloadable computer operating software for advanced driver assistance systems; downloadable and recorded visualizer software that tracks, measures, models, and provides information on physical environments; Visualization apparatus consisting of a sensor, computing hardware, communication device, and software to sense, measure, control, and communicate data on surroundings; Visualization sensor device; Visualization computing hardware; Visualization sensor software for sensing, measuring, tracking, controlling and communicating visual information and data; visualization sensors, computing hardware, software for sensing, measuring, tracking, controlling and communicating data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |