Drawing for S SYMPHONIX

USPTO serial 99652057

S SYMPHONIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRENNER, BRANDI M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S SYMPHONIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Sineway

Daniel E. Sineway Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP1230 Peachtree Street NESuite 2100Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for loan management for lenders; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for lease management for lessors; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for storing, managing, tracking, analyzing, and reporting data in the field of lending, leasing, borrower management and investor management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for borrower and lessee credit assessments and background checks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for lender-borrower and lessor-lessee customer relationship management and accessing customer information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for linking borrowers and lenders and lessors and lessees on an online platform; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for investment management, namely, creating investor profiles and managing investor portfolios; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating communication among lending and leasing peer professionals; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for computer application customization for lending and leasing services; Design, development, and implementation of software for loan management; Design, development, and implementation of software for lease management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for lease management services, namely, processing lease applications and lease origination, lease underwriting, funding of loans, lease servicing, lease restructuring, running credit diagnostics analysis, lease payment collection and automation of decision-making processes for lease approval; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for lenders to manage loans, namely, software for loan origination, underwriting, funding of loans, servicing, restructuring, running credit diagnostics analysis, loan payment collection and automation of decision-making processes for loan approvalACTIVEDec 18, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance