USPTO serial 99652284
CINDER CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINDER CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seoul, KR
SEONGNAM-SI, GYEONGGI-DO, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street, 22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103-3207United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded video game software; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable music files; Downloadable computer graphics; Downloadable computer software for creating and managing image files of graphics authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable game software for use on mobile applications; Downloadable multimedia files containing audio and video relating to video games; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, reports, manuals and magazines in the field of video games; Pre-recorded optical discs featuring video games, machine-readable; Video game cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions in the field of e-sports competitions; Providing amusement arcade services; Organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; Providing online non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, reports, manuals and magazines in the field of video games; Organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes; Film production; Providing on-line computer games; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Providing entertainment information in the field of video games via a website; Computer education training services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |