USPTO serial 99654731
LINELIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINELIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rietheim-Weilheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Bond
Katherine Bond CISLO & THOMAS LLP2829 Townsgate Road, Ste. 330Westlake Village, CA 91361United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Signaling systems comprising LED lighting strips and customized housings for illuminating the operating status of machines, being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | signaling communication devices, namely, acoustic, optical and radio signal transmitters, electric warning lights, flashing safety lights, and strobe lights being warning beacons, telecommunication signal towers, electric buzzers, electronic warning horns, sirens, signal bells, and radio elements being radio signal receivers for warning and emergency purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |