USPTO serial 99655336
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oak Brook, IL, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward L. Bishop
Edward L. Bishop Bishop & Diehl, Ltd.1475 E. Woodfield RoadSuite 800Schaumburg, IL 60173| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting training programs, workshops and seminars in the field of artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence platforms. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence (AI); computer softeware consulting services, namely, evaluation and selection of artificial intelligence software platforms and tools for others; computer software consulting services, namely, advising others regarding the implementation, integration, and customization of artificial intelligence software platforms; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer software problems and maintenance of artificial intelligence computer software; all of the foregoing excluding software as a service (SaaS) services, artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services, and the provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable software. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |