USPTO serial 99656219
INTELLIGENT ENTRY MACHINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORAN, CAROLINE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with INTELLIGENT ENTRY MACHINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RYAN DEAN
RYAN DEAN UMBERG ZIPSER LLP1920 Main StreetSuite 750Irvine, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrically powered gate and door operating machines; automatic barrier gate mechanisms, namely, swing gate operators, slide gate operators, overhead gate operators, and barrier arm gate operators; vehicle access-control machinery, namely, garage door openers, automatic vehicular gate operators and traffic control barrier arm operators. | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic access-control systems, namely, telephone systems comprised of a wall-mounted intercom unit, microphone, speaker, and control board that allow visitors to communicate with a residence or premises to gain entry through a gate; video systems comprised of a camera, intercom unit, and control board for controlling access to a premises; intercom systems comprised of communication units and a control board for controlling access to a premises; electronic access-control devices, namely, keypads, card readers, RF transmitters and receivers, wireless communication modules, elevator control modules, and door and gate interface controllers; electronic access-control systems for barrier gates, vehicle spikes, and bollards comprised of keypads, card readers, control boards, and loop detectors; electronic key cards; electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus; downloadable software and firmware for gate operation, access control, monitoring, system management, and wireless communication; electronic components for entry and access-control systems, namely, remote controls, loop detectors, and circuit boards. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for gate and door operation, access control, monitoring of access events, system management, and wireless communication; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring cloud-based software that wirelessly grants or denies access to premises and community amenities, registers access times and events, and provides video camera monitoring of gated areas. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |