USPTO serial 99657118
HARD RESET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KNIEF, MITCHELL IRVIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HARD RESET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra Jordan Glancy
Alexandra Jordan Glancy Coates IP LLP3213 W Wheeler St. #362Attn: TrademarksSeattle, WA 98199Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Organizing and hosting of events for cultural purposes in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Hosting and conducting social entertainment events purposes in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of short-form news and opinion posts in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Online publication of blogs in the fields of tech industry news and industry and labor; Production of podcasts in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Providing online non-downloadable educational podcasts in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Conducting fellowship training programs in the fields of labor, technology news and trends, and media; On-line electronic newsletters delivered by e-mail in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Publication of newsletters in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Providing news in the nature of current event reporting relating to tech industry news and trends and labor via the Internet; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of current events relating to tech industry news and trends and labor; Production and distribution of videos in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the fields of tech industry news and trends and labor; none of the foregoing featuring or relating to video games, computer games, gaming software, gaming hardware, or accessories specifically adapted for use therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |