USPTO serial 99657593
ITG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Cheshire Rigler
1722 15th Avenue SouthNashville, TN 37212United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Telecommunications technology consultancy; Design of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; Research services in the field of information and telecommunications technology; Telecommunications engineering consultancy; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the telecommunications industry; Providing planning and engineering services in the field of information and communications networks; Engineering design services; Product development and engineering services for others; Engineering services; Software engineering services; Design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; Locating and marking placement of underground utility pipes, cable or wires; Design of unified communications services; Technical support services, namely, 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; Computer technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; Civil engineering; Civil engineering relating to telecommunications; Providing engineering information via a website; Providing information relating to computer technology via a website; Providing engineering information in the field of telecommunications via a website; Hydrologic engineering services; Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and design of storm drainage infrastructure; Civil infrastructure engineering services; Civil engineering relating to water, sewer, drainage, stormwater, gas, electrical, telecommunications, and data systems; Professional consulting services in the fields of engineering, land use planning, surveying, and environmental sciences; Planning and layout design services for civil infrastructure, water, sewer, drainage, stormwater, gas, electrical, telecommunications, and data systems; Consulting in the field of engineering; Engineering services for building and property condition assessment, facility management, repair and restoration and building instrumentation; Electrical engineering | ACTIVE | Nov 13, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |