USPTO serial 99658078
THAKAR MARK OF QUALITY MARQUE DE QUALITÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAFAI, NIKKI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THAKAR MARK OF QUALITY MARQUE DE QUALITÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pankaj S Raval
Pankaj S Raval Carbon Law Group, APLC1001 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 100 #3200Los Angeles, CA 90017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jellies and jams; Preserved fruit; Frozen fruits; Cooked fruits and vegetables; Milk; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Potato-based snack foods; Legume-based snack foods; Dried lentils | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2018 |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; Rice; Tapioca and sago; Flour; Bread; Pastries; Edible ices; Sugar, honey, treacle; Yeast, baking powder; Salt; Mustard; Vinegar; Sauces; Spices; Ice; Nut confectionery; Non-medicated mint flavored confectionery; Confectionery made of sugar; Peanut brittle; Seasonings; Rice-based snack food; Crispy breads made of tapioca flour; Crispy breads made of lentil flour; Crispy breads made of rice flour; Flour based snacks; Rusks; Cookies | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2018 |
| 031 | Fresh fruit and vegetables | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2018 |
| 032 | Beers; Mineral and aerated waters; Carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; Non-alcoholic drinks containing fruit juices; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Syrups for making non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THAKAR EXPORTS
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named THAKAR MARK OF QUALITY MARQUE DE QUALITÉ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |