Drawing for NUTRIQUEST AUXION

USPTO serial 99658717

NUTRIQUEST AUXION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOUNDAR, SHERYL CHRISTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRIQUEST AUXION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan E. Meggison-Decker

Jordan E. Meggison-Decker BrownWinick Law Firm666 Grand Ave.Suite 2000Des Moines, IA 50309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary supplements for animals; Dietary supplements for livestock; Feed supplements for animals; Feed supplements for livestock; Animal feed supplements; Nutritional supplements for animals; Nutritional supplements for livestock; Food supplements for animals; Food supplements; Food supplements for livestockACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 18, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 18, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 18, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance