USPTO serial 99659536
DATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DRUHAN, CONNOR M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Oliner
Elizabeth Oliner Oliner Law345 Grove St., 2nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; Carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; Fruit-based beverages; Powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Fruit concentrates and purees used for making non-alcoholic fruit-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |