USPTO serial 99662237
SIBYL BOARDROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIBYL BOARDROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miami, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica W. Stump
Erica W. Stump Erica W. Stump, P.A.110 E. Broward BlvdSuite 1700Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for multi-model artificial intelligence arbitration and consensus-building; computer software featuring adversarial cross-examination protocols between multiple AI language models; software for orchestrating structured deliberation among heterogeneous AI systems; computer application software for coordinating parallel analysis and critique among multiple artificial intelligence models; downloadable software for managing domain-adaptive routing and weighted consensus synthesis in multi-model AI systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for multi-model AI arbitration through adversarial cross-examination; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for orchestrating structured debates between multiple artificial intelligence models; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for coordinating critique protocols and consensus-building among heterogeneous AI systems; cloud computing services featuring software for managing domain-adaptive model selection and weighted arbitration in multi-LLM environments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |