Drawing for SIDEKICK ROBOTICS

USPTO serial 99662990

SIDEKICK ROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REED, NATASHA DEMETRIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 138

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDEKICK ROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Delcin

Catherine Delcin Delcin Consulting Group1800 Sutter StreetSuite 500CONCORD, CA 94520

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence (AI) for assisting human beings with household chores and tasksACTIVEMay 1, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance