USPTO serial 99665317
VHT VAPOR HONING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALIENDO, COURTNEY MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VHT VAPOR HONING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lincolnton, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ticora E. Davis
Ticora E. Davis The Creator's Law Firm9900 Poplar Tent RdSte 115 PMB 3052Concord, NC 28027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools for wet abrasive blasting, washing equipment, and sand blasting; Sand blasting machines; Electric washing machines for industrial purposes; Washing machine for industrial parts; Particle blast cleaning machines and structural parts thereof | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |