USPTO serial 99665684
HINOYA CURRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HINOYA CURRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miki Motohashi Iino
Miki Motohashi Iino Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon Boulevard Suite 1400Arlington Courthouse Plaza IArlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Curry stew mixes; Instant curry stew; Pre-cooked curry stew; Retort-pouch curry stew | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Curry roux; Curry sauce; Curry sauce mixes; Instant curry sauces; Curry pastes; Curry powder; Instant curry sauce; Pre-cooked curry sauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Oct 24, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |