USPTO serial 99666601
NOSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kanika Radhakrishnan
Kanika Radhakrishnan Evergreen Valley Law Group2570 N. first street, ste 200ste 200San Jose, CA 95131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Robots for cooking | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2020 |
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for controlling, operating, and managing robotic kitchen appliances and automated food preparation machines; downloadable computer software for programming cooking instructions; downloadable computer application software for operating automated cooking devices; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for food preparation and meal customization | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2020 |
| 011 | Programmable electronic devices for setting temperatures and cook times which also feature recipes, sold as a component of gas cooking ovens, electric cooking ovens and electric deep fryers; Electric cooking ovens for household purposes; Electric pressure cookers; Electric food steamers | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |