USPTO serial 99666960
GOODFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ANDREW T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Stohry
Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Analyzing and compiling business data; Data processing services; Compilation of information into computer databases; Analysis of business data; Analysis of market research data and statistics; Market research; Business research; Computer-assisted business information and research services; Business strategic planning services; Services consisting of the registration, collection, transcription, compilation and systemization of written communications and data; Analyzing and compiling business data for the purpose of strategic business planning; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Marketing plan development; Marketing consulting; Analyzing and compiling business data for the purpose of providing marketing consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data mining; Design and development of computer software for the collation, processing and analysis of business data; Design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software; Maintenance and upgrading of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the collation, processing and analysis of business data; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for the collation, processing and analysis of business data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for the collation, processing and analysis of business data over computer networks and the internet; Cloud storage services for electronic data; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; Electronic data storage; Development, updating and maintenance of software and database systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |