USPTO serial 99667313
HYPERCHARGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGYEKUM, STEPHEN YIADOM BOAKY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 303
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HYPERCHARGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Jordan
Lynn M. Jordan Kelly IP, LLP1150 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 600Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings; action figures; cases for action figures; play sets for action figures; scale model figurines; collectable toy figures; clothing for toy figures; toys; plush toys; puzzles; handheld computer games equipment; home video game machines and hand-held video game machines; computer games consoles; computer games equipment adapted for use with TV receivers; controllers and joysticks for consumer video games; simulation game apparatus for video, computer and interactive or virtual reality games; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; all of the aforementioned excluding any goods relating to wagering, casino gaming, slot machines, or other games of chance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |