USPTO serial 99667653
TURQUOISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURQUOISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Oliner
Elizabeth Oliner Oliner Law345 Grove St., 2nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in providing a healthcare price transparency database; Database design and development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in providing price transparency data and managed care contracting for the healthcare industry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in providing consumers and patients with access to healthcare pricing and allowing providers to list clear services, negotiate market rates, manage contracts, and connect with consumers and patients; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in providing a search engine for users, consumers and patients to compare relative costs of healthcare and the prices of procedures at various hospitals; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating instant good faith estimates related to healthcare costs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating healthcare market and pricing analysis tools for employers | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |