USPTO serial 99669091
LUNOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARUSO, JAMES J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUNOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Florence, SC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Buchanan
J. Matthew Buchanan MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD, LLCOne Maritime Plaza, Fifth Floor720 Water StreetToledo, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Bone screws for use in fusion of the sacroiliac joint; Medical devices, namely, metal bone screws designed to be inserted across the sacroiliac joint; Bone screws made of metal and designed to be inserted across the sacroiliac joint; Medical devices, namely, sacroiliac joint fusion implants being bone implants composed of artificial materials; Medical devices comprising a metal screw in the nature of a bone screw intended for fusion of the sacroiliac joint; Medical instruments, namely, drivers in the nature of surgical instruments for inserting metal bone screws across the sacroiliac joint; Instrument cases, namely, medical trays for medical devices in the nature of implantable metal bone screws designed to be inserted across the sacroiliac joint and drivers for inserting metal bone screws across the sacroiliac joint | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |