USPTO serial 99669450
BED DRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BED DRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New River, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy K Akbar
Wendy K Akbar Venjuris PC1938 E Osborn RoadPhoenix, AZ 85016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bedroom furniture; Mattress cushions; Mattress foundations; Sleep products, namely, mattresses, spring mattresses, box springs and mattress foundations; Mattress toppers; Mattresses; Spring mattresses | ACTIVE | Dec 28, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | RSHD | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING DENIED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |