USPTO serial 99670107
KAIROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEGGS, MONICA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAIROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Won
Karen K. Won Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, and Popeo P.C.One Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable custom artificial intelligence software for facilitating private equity deals for private equity deal teams; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software utilizing artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring and synthesizing of market and company intelligence, including performance, profile, risk, forecasts, value levers, and competitive dynamics; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software utilizing artificial intelligence to manage and streamline deal workflows and operations, notices and disclosures, fund performance, market forecasting and valuation, compliance and risk management; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software utilizing artificial intelligence to produce investment memos, pitch decks, and public announcements; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software utilizing artificial intelligence for automating, facilitating, consolidating, and accelerating deal transaction workflows, fund operations, deal sourcing, and deal pipeline management; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software utilizing artificial intelligence for extracting actional insights, compounding institutional intelligence, enhancing strategic decision-making, making customized recommendations, and improving operational efficiency for private equity teams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |