USPTO serial 99670919
SOHU.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOHU.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W Olympic Blvd9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable image files containing artwork, photographs, edited photographs, pictures and drawings; Downloadable ring tones for mobile telephones; Downloadable music files; Computer operating programs, recorded; Recorded computer operating programs; Smartglasses; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of electronic books in the field of artificial intelligence; Computers; Computer peripheral devices; Downloadable computer software for news, sports, entertainment and movies; Audio- and video-receivers; Downloadable computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Downloadable mobile applications for downloading and reading electronic publications on portable electronic devices; Downloadable graphic design templates; Downloadable computer software for use as an e-wallet; Downloadable computer software for use as a digital wallet; Downloadable maps; Downloadable video files in the field of sports highlights, movie clips, music concerts; Downloadable graphics for mobile phones; Video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons; Photographic transparencies; Electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; Computer chips; Semiconductor chips; Batteries, electric; Auxiliary battery packs; Mobile telephones; Cameras; Electric cables and wires; Electronic pens; Phonograph records featuring music; Digital audio tape players; Compact discs featuring music; Radio receivers for remote controls; Wire connectors; Semiconductors; Electric sensors; Switches, electric; Video screens; Light emitting diode (LED) displays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |