USPTO serial 99672741
LOTUSQ AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATEL, SHEENA KAPOOR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with LOTUSQ AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marlborough, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chelsea P. Everson
Chelsea P. Everson Varnum LLP101 N. Main StreetSuite 525Ann Arbor, MI 48104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting users, using artificial intelligence-based techniques, in organizing and analyzing regulatory and quality documentation for regulated life sciences development and manufacturing, supporting regulatory and quality compliance by identifying potential gaps relative to selected regulatory requirements and standards and generating compliance related assessments, reports, and configurable views across facilities and third-party suppliers. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |