Drawing for CANNABIS NYC

USPTO serial 99672851

CANNABIS NYC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANNABIS NYC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Laut

Steven Laut SHERMAN IP LLP15760 Ventura Blvd.Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing consumer information and related news in the field of cannabis tourism in New York State, namely, information about licensed cannabis dispensaries, cannabis farms, cannabis events, cannabis tourism destinations, and cannabis-related travel experiences; promoting the State of New York as a tourist attraction and enhancing its economic developmentACTIVEFeb 15, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 6, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2026TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Feb 28, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance